↓ Skip to main content

Consultations on driving in people with cognitive impairment in primary care: A scoping review of the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consultations on driving in people with cognitive impairment in primary care: A scoping review of the evidence
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0205580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Sinnott, Tony Foley, Justin Forsyth, Kathleen McLoughlin, Linda Horgan, Colin P. Bradley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 22%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Psychology 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 8 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,672,366
of 13,647,261 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#26,373
of 144,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,664
of 262,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#138
of 532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,647,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.