↓ Skip to main content

Longchain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infants born at term.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longchain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infants born at term.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000376.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simmer K, Patole SK, Rao SC

Abstract

The n-3 and n-6 fatty acids linolenic acid and linoleic acid are precursors of the n-3 and n-6 long chain fatty acids (LCPUFA). Infant formula has historically only contained the precursor fatty acids. Over the last few years, some manufacturers have added LCPUFA to formulae and marketed them as providing an advantage for the development of term infants.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Psychology 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2014.
All research outputs
#742,784
of 13,190,464 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,421
of 10,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,073
of 185,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,190,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.