↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive user requirements engineering methodology for secure and interoperable health data exchange

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive user requirements engineering methodology for secure and interoperable health data exchange
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12911-018-0664-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pantelis Natsiavas, Janne Rasmussen, Maja Voss-Knude, Κostas Votis, Luigi Coppolino, Paolo Campegiani, Isaac Cano, David Marí, Giuliana Faiella, Fabrizio Clemente, Marco Nalin, Evangelos Grivas, Oana Stan, Erol Gelenbe, Jos Dumortier, Jan Petersen, Dimitrios Tzovaras, Luigi Romano, Ioannis Komnios, Vassilis Koutkias

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Lecturer 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 28 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 20%
Engineering 13 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 13%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,087,187
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#355
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,322
of 348,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.