You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing the utility and limitations of accelerometers and machine learning approaches in classifying behaviour during lactation in a phocid seal
|
---|---|
Published in |
Animal Biotelemetry, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40317-018-0158-y |
Authors |
Courtney R. Shuert, Patrick P. Pomeroy, Sean D. Twiss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
United States | 2 | 14% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 9 | 64% |
Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
Researcher | 12 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 45% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,137,795
of 25,000,733 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#98
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,985
of 354,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,000,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.