↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the utility and limitations of accelerometers and machine learning approaches in classifying behaviour during lactation in a phocid seal

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the utility and limitations of accelerometers and machine learning approaches in classifying behaviour during lactation in a phocid seal
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40317-018-0158-y
Authors

Courtney R. Shuert, Patrick P. Pomeroy, Sean D. Twiss

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 55%
Environmental Science 5 11%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,998,102
of 15,153,052 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#58
of 152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,763
of 325,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,153,052 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.