↓ Skip to main content

Methods used in the spatial analysis of tuberculosis epidemiology: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods used in the spatial analysis of tuberculosis epidemiology: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12916-018-1178-4
Authors

Debebe Shaweno, Malancha Karmakar, Kefyalew Addis Alene, Romain Ragonnet, Archie CA Clements, James M. Trauer, Justin T. Denholm, Emma S. McBryde

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 33 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,869,207
of 13,644,402 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,038
of 2,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,615
of 312,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#226
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.