↓ Skip to main content

Zika Virus in the Americas — Yet Another Arbovirus Threat

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
111 news outlets
blogs
21 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1399 tweeters
facebook
42 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
26 Google+ users
reddit
4 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
675 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
805 Mendeley
Title
Zika Virus in the Americas — Yet Another Arbovirus Threat
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.1056/nejmp1600297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony S. Fauci, David M. Morens

Abstract

The explosive pandemic of Zika virus infection occurring throughout South America, Central America, and the Caribbean (see map) and potentially threatening the United States is the most recent of four unexpected arrivals of important arthropod-borne viral diseases in the Western Hemisphere over the past 20 years. It follows dengue, which entered this hemisphere stealthily over decades and then more aggressively in the 1990s; West Nile virus, which emerged in 1999; and chikungunya, which emerged in 2013. Are the successive migrations of these viruses unrelated, or do they reflect important new patterns of disease emergence? Furthermore, are there secondary health consequences . . .

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,399 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 805 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 2%
Brazil 10 1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Colombia 4 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 758 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 147 18%
Student > Master 139 17%
Researcher 117 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 7%
Other 186 23%
Unknown 71 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 197 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 165 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 96 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 55 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 4%
Other 163 20%
Unknown 99 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1925. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,784
of 15,889,502 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#105
of 27,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 372,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,889,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.