↓ Skip to main content

Statistical Analyses Support Power Law Distributions Found in Neuronal Avalanches

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical Analyses Support Power Law Distributions Found in Neuronal Avalanches
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019779
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Klaus, Shan Yu, Dietmar Plenz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 4%
France 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 236 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 29%
Researcher 50 19%
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Professor 16 6%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 20 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 44 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 16%
Neuroscience 34 13%
Engineering 28 10%
Computer Science 20 7%
Other 69 26%
Unknown 29 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,666,833
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#20,451
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,987
of 126,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#178
of 1,729 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,729 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.