↓ Skip to main content

Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
72 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
520 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis
Published in
BMJ Open, October 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ibone Olza, Patricia Leahy-Warren, Yael Benyamini, Maria Kazmierczak, Sigfridur Inga Karlsdottir, Andria Spyridou, Esther Crespo-Mirasol, Lea Takács, Priscilla J Hall, Margaret Murphy, Sigridur Sia Jonsdottir, Soo Downe, Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 520 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 520 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 11%
Student > Master 51 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 7%
Researcher 26 5%
Lecturer 24 5%
Other 100 19%
Unknown 228 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 107 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 10%
Psychology 32 6%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Unspecified 15 3%
Other 54 10%
Unknown 242 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#648,681
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,081
of 25,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,887
of 361,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#22
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.