You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characteristics of iodine-123 IQ-SPECT/CT imaging compared with conventional SPECT/CT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12149-018-1310-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takayuki Shibutani, Masahisa Onoguchi, Hiroto Yoneyama, Takahiro Konishi, Shinro Matsuo, Kenichi Nakajima |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
| Librarian | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
| Psychology | 1 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,548,510
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#314
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,184
of 348,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.