↓ Skip to main content

Structural basis of RNA recognition and dimerization by the STAR proteins T-STAR and Sam68

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural basis of RNA recognition and dimerization by the STAR proteins T-STAR and Sam68
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms10355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikael Feracci, Jaelle N. Foot, Sushma N. Grellscheid, Marina Danilenko, Ralf Stehle, Oksana Gonchar, Hyun-Seo Kang, Caroline Dalgliesh, N. Helge Meyer, Yilei Liu, Albert Lahat, Michael Sattler, Ian C. Eperon, David J. Elliott, Cyril Dominguez

Abstract

Sam68 and T-STAR are members of the STAR family of proteins that directly link signal transduction with post-transcriptional gene regulation. Sam68 controls the alternative splicing of many oncogenic proteins. T-STAR is a tissue-specific paralogue that regulates the alternative splicing of neuronal pre-mRNAs. STAR proteins differ from most splicing factors, in that they contain a single RNA-binding domain. Their specificity of RNA recognition is thought to arise from their property to homodimerize, but how dimerization influences their function remains unknown. Here, we establish at atomic resolution how T-STAR and Sam68 bind to RNA, revealing an unexpected mode of dimerization different from other members of the STAR family. We further demonstrate that this unique dimerization interface is crucial for their biological activity in splicing regulation, and suggest that the increased RNA affinity through dimer formation is a crucial parameter enabling these proteins to select their functional targets within the transcriptome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 21%
Chemistry 9 9%
Computer Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#479,059
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#8,354
of 48,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,294
of 397,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#151
of 753 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 753 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.