You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Agglomeration of Luminescent Porous Silicon Nanoparticles in Colloidal Solutions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Discover Nano, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s11671-016-1593-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kateřina Herynková, Miroslav Šlechta, Petra Šimáková, Anna Fučíková, Ondřej Cibulka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 30% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 3 | 30% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Materials Science | 1 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#538
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,160
of 355,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.