↓ Skip to main content

DNA Qualification Workflow for Next Generation Sequencing of Histopathological Samples

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
455 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA Qualification Workflow for Next Generation Sequencing of Histopathological Samples
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062692
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Simbolo, Marisa Gottardi, Vincenzo Corbo, Matteo Fassan, Andrea Mafficini, Giorgio Malpeli, Rita T. Lawlor, Aldo Scarpa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 443 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 91 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 16%
Student > Master 70 15%
Researcher 50 11%
Other 22 5%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 88 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 109 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 4%
Chemistry 16 4%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 105 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,926,490
of 25,116,143 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#35,902
of 217,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,012
of 203,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#805
of 4,608 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,116,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,608 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.