You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriane Martin Hilber, Suzanna C. Francis, Matthew Chersich, Pippa Scott, Shelagh Redmond, Nicole Bender, Paolo Miotti, Marleen Temmerman, Nicola Low |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 21% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#848,549
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,189
of 219,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,273
of 177,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#56
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.