You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding innovators' experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Barnett, Konstantina Vasileiou, Fayika Djemil, Laurence Brooks, Terry Young |
| Abstract |
Healthcare service innovations are considered to play a pivotal role in improving organisational efficiency and responding effectively to healthcare needs. Nevertheless, healthcare organisations encounter major difficulties in sustaining and diffusing innovations, especially those which concern the organisation and delivery of healthcare services. The purpose of the present study was to explore how healthcare innovators of process-based initiatives perceived and made sense of factors that either facilitated or obstructed the innovation implementation and diffusion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 407 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 87 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 14% |
| Researcher | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 19% |
| Unknown | 93 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 67 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 9% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 86 | 20% |
| Unknown | 101 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,899,365
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,281
of 7,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,510
of 241,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#11
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.