↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
63 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
5 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages
Published in
GeroScience, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juha P. Ahtiainen, Simon Walker, Heikki Peltonen, Jarkko Holviala, Elina Sillanpää, Laura Karavirta, Janne Sallinen, Jussi Mikkola, Heli Valkeinen, Antti Mero, Juha J. Hulmi, Keijo Häkkinen

Abstract

Physical activity recommendations for public health include typically muscle-strengthening activities for a minimum of 2 days a week. The range of inter-individual variation in responses to resistance training (RT) aiming to improve health and well-being requires to be investigated. The purpose of this study was to quantify high and low responders for RT-induced changes in muscle size and strength and to examine possible effects of age and sex on these responses. Previously collected data of untrained healthy men and women (age 19 to 78 years, n = 287 with 72 controls) were pooled for the present study. Muscle size and strength changed during RT are 4.8 ± 6.1 % (range from -11 to 30 %) and 21.1 ± 11.5 % (range from -8 to 60 %) compared to pre-RT, respectively. Age and sex did not affect to the RT responses. Fourteen percent and 12 % of the subjects were defined as high responders (>1 standard deviation (SD) from the group mean) for the RT-induced changes in muscle size and strength, respectively. When taking into account the results of non-training controls (upper 95 % CI), 29 and 7 % of the subjects were defined as low responders for the RT-induced changes in muscle size and strength, respectively. The muscle size and strength responses varied extensively between the subjects regardless of subject's age and sex. Whether these changes are associated with, e.g., functional capacity and metabolic health improvements due to RT requires further studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 386 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 17%
Student > Bachelor 58 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 13%
Researcher 25 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 4%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 116 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 134 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 132 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#649,979
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#85
of 1,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,300
of 404,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.