↓ Skip to main content

Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004026.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Marshall, Ruth Crowther, William Hurt Sledge, John Rathbone, Karla Soares-Weiser

Abstract

Inpatient treatment is an expensive way of caring for people with acute psychiatric disorders. It has been proposed that many of those currently treated as inpatients could be cared for in acute psychiatric day hospitals.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 161 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 21%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 30%
Psychology 30 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 28 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#921,685
of 14,561,658 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,739
of 10,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,407
of 213,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,561,658 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.