Title |
Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00836-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexander E P Heazell, Dimitrios Siassakos, Hannah Blencowe, Christy Burden, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Joanne Cacciatore, Nghia Dang, Jai Das, Vicki Flenady, Katherine J Gold, Olivia K Mensah, Joseph Millum, Daniel Nuzum, Keelin O'Donoghue, Maggie Redshaw, Arjumand Rizvi, Tracy Roberts, H E Toyin Saraki, Claire Storey, Aleena M Wojcieszek, Soo Downe, Vicki Flenady, J Frederik Frøen, Mary V Kinney, Luc de Bernis, Joy E Lawn, Hannah Blencowe, Alexander E P Heazell, Susannah Hopkins Leisher, Ingela Radestad, Louise Jackson, Chidubem Ogwulu, Alison Hills, Stephanie Bradley, Wendy Taylor, Jayne Budd |
Abstract |
Despite the frequency of stillbirths, the subsequent implications are overlooked and underappreciated. We present findings from comprehensive, systematic literature reviews, and new analyses of published and unpublished data, to establish the effect of stillbirth on parents, families, health-care providers, and societies worldwide. Data for direct costs of this event are sparse but suggest that a stillbirth needs more resources than a livebirth, both in the perinatal period and in additional surveillance during subsequent pregnancies. Indirect and intangible costs of stillbirth are extensive and are usually met by families alone. This issue is particularly onerous for those with few resources. Negative effects, particularly on parental mental health, might be moderated by empathic attitudes of care providers and tailored interventions. The value of the baby, as well as the associated costs for parents, families, care providers, communities, and society, should be considered to prevent stillbirths and reduce associated morbidity. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 18% |
Ireland | 8 | 12% |
United States | 8 | 12% |
Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
Israel | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Comoros | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 35 | 54% |
Scientists | 14 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Myanmar | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 680 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 119 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 86 | 12% |
Researcher | 79 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 8% |
Other | 43 | 6% |
Other | 147 | 21% |
Unknown | 163 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 170 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 137 | 20% |
Psychology | 62 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 33 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 4% |
Other | 74 | 11% |
Unknown | 185 | 27% |