↓ Skip to main content

Social skills training for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social skills training for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008223.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ole Jakob Storebø, Maria Skoog, Dorte Damm, Per Hove Thomsen, Erik Simonsen, Christian Gluud

Abstract

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children is associated with hyperactivity and impulsitivity, attention problems, and difficulties with social interactions. Pharmacological treatment may alleviate symptoms of ADHD but seldom solves difficulties with social interactions. Social skills training may benefit ADHD children in their social interactions. We examined the effects of social skills training on children's social competences, general behaviour, ADHD symptoms, and performance in school.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 304 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 20%
Researcher 47 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 63 20%
Unknown 44 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 28%
Psychology 79 25%
Social Sciences 26 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 7%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 59 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,717,238
of 12,620,777 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,372
of 10,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,703
of 213,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#234
of 533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,620,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.