↓ Skip to main content

Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006528.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norio Watanabe, Ichiro M Omori, Atsuo Nakagawa, Andrea Cipriani, Corrado Barbui, Rachel Churchill, Toshi A Furukawa

Abstract

Mirtazapine has a unique mechanism of antidepressive action and is one of the commonly used antidepressants in clinical practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 44%
Student > Master 18 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Postgraduate 8 13%
Other 30 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 74%
Psychology 16 26%
Unspecified 12 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Other 18 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#547,436
of 13,045,107 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,783
of 10,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,475
of 213,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,045,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.