↓ Skip to main content

Testing an attachment method for solar-powered tracking devices on a long-distance migrating shorebird

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing an attachment method for solar-powered tracking devices on a long-distance migrating shorebird
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10336-015-1276-4
Authors

Ying-Chi Chan, Maarten Brugge, T. Lee Tibbitts, Anne Dekinga, Ron Porter, Raymond H. G. Klaassen, Theunis Piersma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 48%
Environmental Science 16 28%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,885,453
of 12,475,873 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#235
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,618
of 330,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#49
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,475,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.