↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgery, May 2019
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000003072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio A. Acuna, Tyler R. Chesney, Joshua K. Ramjist, Prakesh S. Shah, Erin D. Kennedy, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 31%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,043,308
of 15,340,588 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#809
of 6,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,345
of 323,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#30
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,340,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.