↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgery, May 2019
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000003072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio A. Acuna, Tyler R. Chesney, Joshua K. Ramjist, Prakesh S. Shah, Erin D. Kennedy, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unknown 10 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,175,319
of 16,579,356 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#884
of 7,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,357
of 327,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#27
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,579,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.