↓ Skip to main content

Enhancement of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis by Leishmania extract: identification of a disease-associated antibody specificity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancement of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis by Leishmania extract: identification of a disease-associated antibody specificity
Published in
BMC Research Notes, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1158-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virgínia M. G. Silva, Cíntia F. de-Araújo, Isabela C. Navarro, Pablo R. S. Oliveira, Lain Pontes–de-Carvalho

Abstract

Both Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania amazonensis induce cutaneous disease when injected in the skin of BALB/c mice. However, L. amazonensis may also visceralize in that strain of mice, infecting mainly the liver and spleen. In addition, whereas BALB/c mice die with a progressive cutaneous disease when infected by L. amazonensis, the infection by L. braziliensis is spontaneously cured. In a previous work, we have found that intravenous injections of L. amazonensis amastigote extract (LaE) potentiated a L. braziliensis infection in BALB/c mice, and that this infection-promoting activity could be inhibited by the addition of protease inhibitors to the extract. In order to detect markers of disease evolution, in the present work we analyzed the specificity of the anti-L. amazonensis antibody response of BALB/c mice injected intravenously with saline or LaE, supplemented or not with protease inhibitors, by the Western blot technique. IgG1 antibodies recognizing an antigen with apparent molecular weight of 116 kDa were specifically detected in BALB/c mice that had been turned susceptible to L. braziliensis infection by injections of LaE. A Th2 immune response (IgG1 antibody-producing) against this 116 kDa antigen, therefore, could be associated with susceptibility to severe Leishmania infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,302,535
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,562
of 4,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,024
of 264,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#69
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.