↓ Skip to main content

Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 54,322)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1140 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/452532
Authors

Mangul, Serghei, Mosqueiro, Thiago, Abdill, Richard J, Duong, Dat, Mitchell, Keith, Sarwal, Varuni, Hill, Brian, Brito, Jaqueline, Littman, Russell, Statz, Benjamin, Lam, Angela, Dayama, Gargi, Grieneisen, Laura, Martin, Lana, Flint, Jonathan, Eskin, Eleazar, Blekhman, Ran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,140 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Librarian 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 26 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Unspecified 3 8%
Computer Science 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 26 65%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 566. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,115
of 13,230,950 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#28
of 54,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#661
of 307,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1
of 5,354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,230,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.