↓ Skip to main content

Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1130 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/452532
Authors

Mangul, Serghei, Mosqueiro, Thiago, Abdill, Richard J, Duong, Dat, Mitchell, Keith, Sarwal, Varuni, Hill, Brian, Brito, Jaqueline, Littman, Russell, Statz, Benjamin, Lam, Angela, Dayama, Gargi, Grieneisen, Laura, Martin, Lana, Flint, Jonathan, Eskin, Eleazar, Blekhman, Ran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,130 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Researcher 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 541. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#18,423
of 15,372,175 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#91
of 88,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#787
of 323,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1
of 5,354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,372,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.