You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-016-0225-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Jeanette Schulz-Menger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 18% |
| Spain | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Russia | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 17% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 59% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,099,574
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#77
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,391
of 408,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.