↓ Skip to main content

Redefining Healthy Urine: A Cross-Sectional Exploratory Metagenomic Study of People With and Without Bladder Dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 114)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Redefining Healthy Urine: A Cross-Sectional Exploratory Metagenomic Study of People With and Without Bladder Dysfunction
Published in
The Journal of Urology, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne L. Groah, Marcos Pérez-Losada, Ljubica Caldovic, Inger H. Ljungberg, Bruce M. Sprague, Eduardo Castro-Nallar, Neel J. Chandel, Michael H. Hsieh, Hans G. Pohl

Abstract

To utilize the PathoScope platform to conduct species-level analyses of publicly available, 16S rRNA pyrosequenced asymptomatic urine data to determine relationships between microbiomes and clinical and functional phenotypes. Reanalysis of previously reported cross-sectionally acquired urine samples from 47 asymptomatic subjects (23 controls and 24 subjects with neuropathic bladder (NB)). Urine was originally collected by the usual method of bladder drainage and analyzed with urinalysis, culture, and pyrosequencing. Urinalysis and culture values were stratified as follows: leukocyte esterase (LE) 0 or ≥1, nitrite (+, -), pyuria <5 or ≥5 white blood cells/high power field (WBC/hpf), cloudy urine (+, -), and bacterial growth <50,000 or ≥50,000 colony forming units (cfu). PathoScope was used for next-generation sequencing alignment, bacterial classification, and characterization of microbial diversity. NB subjects were significantly more likely to have LE+, pyuria+, cloudy urine and bacterial growth. 23/47 samples had bacterial growth on culture while all samples had bacteria identified by pyrosequencing. The non-NB urine microbiomes had greater proportions of Lactobacillus crispatus (females) and Staphylococcus haemolyticus (males). The Lactobacillus community differed significantly amongst females depending on bladder function. Irrespective of gender, NB subjects had greater proportions of Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella pneumonia. In 4 NB subjects, Actinobaculum was detected by sequencing+PathoScope but not by cultivation, and in all cases was associated with pyuria. Utilizing PathoScope plus 16S pyrosequencing, we were able to identify unique phenotype-dependent species-level microbes. Novel findings included an absence of Lactobacillus crispatus in female NB urine, and the presence of Actinobaculum in NB subjects only.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Other 24 27%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,855,975
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#6
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,004
of 406,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.