You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Common KIF6 Polymorphism Increases Vulnerability to Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: Two Meta-Analyses and a Meta-Regression Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0028834 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brian A. Ference, Wonsuk Yoo, John M. Flack, Michael Clarke |
Abstract |
We sought to determine if a common polymorphism can influence vulnerability to LDL cholesterol, and thereby influence the clinical benefit derived from therapies that reduce LDL cholesterol. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 22% |
Researcher | 5 | 22% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Professor | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 35% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2012.
All research outputs
#2,398,775
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,663
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,233
of 243,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#352
of 2,927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.