↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Reactogenicity of Canarypox ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and HIV-1 gp120 AIDSVAX B/E Vaccination in an Efficacy Trial in Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and Reactogenicity of Canarypox ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and HIV-1 gp120 AIDSVAX B/E Vaccination in an Efficacy Trial in Thailand
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027837
Pubmed ID
Authors

Punnee Pitisuttithum, Supachai Rerks-Ngarm, Valai Bussaratid, Jittima Dhitavat, Wirach Maekanantawat, Swangjai Pungpak, Pravan Suntharasamai, Sirivan Vanijanonta, Sorachai Nitayapan, Jaranit Kaewkungwal, Michael Benenson, Patricia Morgan, Robert J. O'Connell, Jeffrey Berenberg, Sanjay Gurunathan, Donald P. Francis, Robert Paris, Joseph Chiu, Donald Stablein, Nelson L. Michael, Jean-Louis Excler, Merlin L. Robb, Jerome H. Kim

Abstract

A prime-boost vaccination regimen with ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) administered intramuscularly at 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks and gp120 AIDSVAX B/E at 12 and 24 weeks demonstrated modest efficacy of 31.2% for prevention of HIV acquisition in HIV-uninfected adults participating in a community-based efficacy trial in Thailand.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Other 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#76,338
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,457
of 243,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#820
of 2,927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.