↓ Skip to main content

Flexible working conditions and their effects on employee health and wellbeing

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
480 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flexible working conditions and their effects on employee health and wellbeing
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008009.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerry Joyce, Roman Pabayo, Julia A Critchley, Clare Bambra

Abstract

Flexible working conditions are increasingly popular in developed countries but the effects on employee health and wellbeing are largely unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
Spain 5 1%
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 453 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 109 23%
Researcher 72 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 7%
Other 94 20%
Unknown 64 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 22%
Social Sciences 81 17%
Psychology 78 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 39 8%
Other 56 12%
Unknown 75 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#318,658
of 14,257,572 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#808
of 10,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,810
of 212,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 501 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,257,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 501 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.