↓ Skip to main content

“I Look in Your Eyes, Honey”: Internal Face Features Induce Spatial Frequency Preference for Human Face Processing

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“I Look in Your Eyes, Honey”: Internal Face Features Induce Spatial Frequency Preference for Human Face Processing
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000329
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias S. Keil

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
China 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 71 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 27%
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Master 12 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 40%
Neuroscience 9 11%
Computer Science 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,343,568
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,955
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,324
of 107,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#13
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.