You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mapping Brain Response to Pain in Fibromyalgia Patients Using Temporal Analysis of fMRI
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005224 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jesus Pujol, Marina López-Solà, Héctor Ortiz, Joan Carles Vilanova, Ben J. Harrison, Murat Yücel, Carles Soriano-Mas, Narcís Cardoner, Joan Deus |
Abstract |
Nociceptive stimuli may evoke brain responses longer than the stimulus duration often partially detected by conventional neuroimaging. Fibromyalgia patients typically complain of severe pain from gentle stimuli. We aimed to characterize brain response to painful pressure in fibromyalgia patients by generating activation maps adjusted for the duration of brain responses. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 175 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
Other | 47 | 25% |
Unknown | 33 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 23% |
Psychology | 29 | 15% |
Neuroscience | 24 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 11% |
Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,217,667
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#42,332
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,188
of 93,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#140
of 518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.