You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Correction to: Differences in cancer survival by sex: a population-based study using cancer registry data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10552-018-1089-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nina Afshar, Dallas R. English, Vicky Thursfield, Paul L. Mitchell, Luc Te Marvelde, Helen Farrugia, Graham G. Giles, Roger L. Milne |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 50% |
Professor | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#409,084
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#30
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,473
of 349,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.