You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cosmetics as a Feature of the Extended Human Phenotype: Modulation of the Perception of Biologically Important Facial Signals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0025656 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy L. Etcoff, Shannon Stock, Lauren E. Haley, Sarah A. Vickery, David M. House |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 74% |
| Scientists | 13 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 262 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 65 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 22% |
| Unknown | 77 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 479. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2023.
All research outputs
#57,034
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#968
of 225,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176
of 146,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#6
of 2,622 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,622 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.