↓ Skip to main content

Pasos para transformar una necesidad en una herramienta válida y útil para la detección oportuna de problemas en el desarrollo infantil en México

Overview of attention for article published in Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pasos para transformar una necesidad en una herramienta válida y útil para la detección oportuna de problemas en el desarrollo infantil en México
Published in
Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bmhimx.2015.11.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Rizzoli-Córdoba, Ismael Delgado-Ginebra

Abstract

A screening test is an instrument whose primary function is to identify individuals with a probable disease among an apparently healthy population, establishing risk or suspicion of a disease. Caution must be taken when using a screening tool in order to avoid unrealistic measurements, delaying an intervention for those who may benefit from it. Before introducing a screening test into clinical practice, it is necessary to certify the presence of some characteristics making its worth useful. This "certification" process is called validation. The main objective of this paper is to describe the different steps that must be taken, from the identification of a need for early detection through the generation of a validated and reliable screening tool using, as an example, the process for the modified version of the Child Development Evaluation Test (CDE or Prueba EDI) in Mexico.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Postgraduate 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,487,512
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México
#2
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,057
of 295,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them