↓ Skip to main content

Phylogeny of Sarocladium (Hypocreales)

Overview of attention for article published in Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
51 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogeny of Sarocladium (Hypocreales)
Published in
Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi, October 2014
DOI 10.3767/003158515x685364
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Giraldo, J. Gené, D.A. Sutton, H. Madrid, G.S. de Hoog, J. Cano, C. Decock, P.W. Crous, J. Guarro

Abstract

The circumscription of the genus Acremonium (Hypocreales) was recently reviewed on the basis of a DNA phylogenetic study. Several species were subsequently transferred to Sarocladium, but the relationships between both genera remained unresolved. Based on multilocus phylogenetic inferences combined with phenotypic data, we have revised the species concepts within Sarocladium and some genetically related species of Acremonium. As a result of these studies, six species are described as new, viz. S. bifurcatum, S. gamsii, S. hominis, S. pseudostrictum, S. subulatum and S. summerbellii. In addition, the new combinations S. implicatum and S. terricola are proposed for A. implicatum and A. terricola, respectively. Sarocladium attenuatum is confirmed as synonym of the type species of the genus, S. oryzae. An epitype and neotype are also introduced for S. oryzae and S. implicatum, respectively. Although Sarocladium species have traditionally been considered as important phytopathogens, the genus also contains opportunistic human pathogens. This study extends the spectrum of clinical species that could be diagnosed as causal agents of human infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,947,179
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi
#57
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,738
of 275,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.