You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early mobilization practices of mechanically ventilated patients: a 1-day point-prevalence study in southern Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2018/e241 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula Caitano Fontela, Thiago Costa Lisboa, Luiz Alberto Forgiarini-Júnior, Gilberto Friedman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Argentina | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 56 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,223,124
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#224
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,810
of 363,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.