↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Efficacy Profile of Neratinib: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 23 Prospective Clinical Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Drug Investigation, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and Efficacy Profile of Neratinib: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 23 Prospective Clinical Trials
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40261-018-0719-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhihang Tao, Stanley Xiangyu Li, Kai Shen, Yunuo Zhao, Hao Zeng, Xuelei Ma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,549,350
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Drug Investigation
#727
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,301
of 350,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Drug Investigation
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.