↓ Skip to main content

A new reductive dl-mandelic acid loading approach for moisture-stable Mn4+ doped fluorides

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical Communications, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
A new reductive dl-mandelic acid loading approach for moisture-stable Mn4+ doped fluorides
Published in
Chemical Communications, January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c8cc05850d
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Huang, Yong Liu, Shuaichen Si, Mikhail G. Brik, Chengxin Wang, Jing Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Materials Science 1 25%
Chemistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,271,461
of 12,867,507 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Communications
#10,098
of 12,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,494
of 300,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Communications
#46
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,867,507 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.