You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disponibilidade de recursos dos serviços ambulatoriais do Sistema Único de Saúde destinados a pessoas vivendo com HIV em Mato Grosso, 2016*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742018000300001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susi Astolfo, Ruth Terezinha Kehrig, Lígia Regina de Oliveira |
| Abstract |
to evaluate the availability of Brazilian National Health System (SUS) outpatient services for people living with HIV in Mato Grosso state, Brazil. this is an evaluative study with descriptive cross-sectional design carried out in 2016; data were collected via the HIV Services Quality Assessment System in all 15 outpatient services; data were analyzed by frequency of answers. five of the 15 services had a sufficient number of physicians; antirretroviral drugs were out of stock for more than seven days in half of the services; other medications for sexually transmitted infections, opportunistic infections, Hepatitis B and C, and metabolic disorders were available in less than 1/3 of the services within the recommended timeframe. resources were found to be deficient in services for people living with HIV in Mato Grosso, mainly regarding the availability of professionals and drugs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,992,387
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#171
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,382
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.