You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi-state occupancy models of foraging habitat use by the Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0205150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. Marcos Gorresen, Kevin W. Brinck, Megan A. DeLisle, Kristina Montoya-Aiona, Corinna A. Pinzari, Frank J. Bonaccorso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,024,344
of 24,294,722 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#127,253
of 209,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,199
of 355,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,873
of 3,287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.