↓ Skip to main content

The easy-to-hard training advantage with real-world medical images

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The easy-to-hard training advantage with real-world medical images
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41235-018-0131-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett D. Roads, Buyun Xu, June K. Robinson, James W. Tanaka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Lecturer 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Neuroscience 2 14%
Computer Science 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,611,717
of 13,725,722 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#101
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,015
of 308,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,725,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.