You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How are they different? A quantitative domain comparison of information visualization and data visualization (2000–2014)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-015-1830-0 |
| Authors |
Meen Chul Kim, Yongjun Zhu, Chaomei Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 31 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Engineering | 11 | 9% |
| Design | 10 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,303,950
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,494
of 2,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,570
of 396,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#60
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.