↓ Skip to main content

Swallowing therapy for dysphagia in acute and subacute stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
70 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
465 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Swallowing therapy for dysphagia in acute and subacute stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000323.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip M Bath, Han Sean Lee, Lisa F Everton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 465 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 12%
Student > Bachelor 45 10%
Researcher 37 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 6%
Other 23 5%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 207 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 79 17%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 34 7%
Unknown 233 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#782,244
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,453
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,891
of 367,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.