You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Change in trade wind inversion frequency implicated in the decline of an alpine plant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Change Responses, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40665-016-0015-2 |
| Authors |
Paul D. Krushelnycky, Forest Starr, Kim Starr, Ryan J. Longman, Abby G. Frazier, Lloyd L. Loope, Thomas W. Giambelluca |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,182,761
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Climate Change Responses
#18
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,111
of 394,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Change Responses
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them