You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cycling and walking for transport: Estimating net health effects from comparison of different transport mode users' self-reported physical activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2191-1991-1-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Knut Veisten, Stefan Flügel, Farideh Ramjerdi, Harald Minken |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 27% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Engineering | 7 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,437,241
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#332
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,264
of 119,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.