You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Canonical vine copulas in the context of modern portfolio management: Are they worth it?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Banking & Finance, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.02.036 |
| Authors |
Rand Kwong Yew Low, Jamie Alcock, Robert Faff, Timothy Brailsford |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 28 | 37% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 17% |
| Engineering | 8 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,456,034
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Banking & Finance
#345
of 1,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,428
of 210,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Banking & Finance
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.