↓ Skip to main content

Is Organismic Fitness at the Basis of Evolutionary Theory?

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy of Science, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Organismic Fitness at the Basis of Evolutionary Theory?
Published in
Philosophy of Science, December 2015
DOI 10.1086/683442
Authors

Charles H. Pence, Grant Ramsey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 42%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 42%
Environmental Science 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Other 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#9,113,633
of 11,880,222 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy of Science
#286
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,556
of 345,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy of Science
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,880,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.