↓ Skip to main content

Home-based child development interventions for preschool children from socially disadvantaged families

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home-based child development interventions for preschool children from socially disadvantaged families
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008131.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Miller, Lisa K Maguire, Geraldine Macdonald

Abstract

Social disadvantage can have a significant impact on early child development, health and wellbeing. What happens during this critical period is important for all aspects of development. Caregiving competence and the quality of the environment play an important role in supporting development in young children and parents have an important role to play in optimising child development and mitigating the negative effects of social disadvantage. Home-based child development programmes aim to optimise children's developmental outcomes through educating, training and supporting parents in their own home to provide a more nurturing and stimulating environment for their child.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 26%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 17%
Social Sciences 21 15%
Psychology 19 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 27 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2013.
All research outputs
#6,788,853
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,047
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,883
of 217,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#322
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.