You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pattern and process in Amazon tree turnover, 19762001
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2003.1438 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
O. L. Phillips, T. R. Baker, L. Arroyo, N. Higuchi, T. J. Killeen, W. F. Laurance, S. L. Lewis, J. Lloyd, Y. Malhi, A. Monteagudo, D. A. Neill, P. Nez Vargas, J. N. M. Silva, J. Terborgh, R. Vsquez Martnez, M. Alexiades, S. Almeida, S. Brown, J. Chave, J. A. Comiskey, C. I. Czimczik, A. Di Fiore, T. Erwin, C. Kuebler, S. G. Laurance, H. E. M. Nascimento, J. Olivier, W. Palacios, S. Patio, N. C. A. Pitman, C. A. Quesada, M. Saldias, A. Torres Lezama, B. Vinceti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 766 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 33 | 4% |
| United States | 11 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Colombia | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Peru | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 2% |
| Unknown | 683 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 165 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 137 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 112 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 47 | 6% |
| Other | 169 | 22% |
| Unknown | 80 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 343 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 228 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 55 | 7% |
| Engineering | 12 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 3% |
| Unknown | 103 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,910,496
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,362
of 7,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,492
of 66,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.