↓ Skip to main content

Multi-scale effects of land cover and urbanization on the habitat suitability of an endangered toad

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-scale effects of land cover and urbanization on the habitat suitability of an endangered toad
Published in
Biological Conservation, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.032
Authors

Michael L. Treglia, Adam C. Landon, Robert N. Fisher, Gerard Kyle, Lee A. Fitzgerald

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 33%
Environmental Science 7 26%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,766,886
of 13,903,017 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,119
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,462
of 312,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#71
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,903,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.