You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cell viability in three ex vivo rat models of spinal cord injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anatomy, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/joa.12909 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Azim Patar, Peter Dockery, Linda Howard, Siobhan S. McMahon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 13 | 31% |
| Engineering | 6 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,419,628
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anatomy
#1,580
of 2,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,718
of 350,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anatomy
#23
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.