↓ Skip to main content

Cell viability in three ex vivo rat models of spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anatomy, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell viability in three ex vivo rat models of spinal cord injury
Published in
Journal of Anatomy, November 2018
DOI 10.1111/joa.12909
Authors

Azim Patar, Peter Dockery, Linda Howard, Siobhan S. McMahon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 67%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 67%
Engineering 2 33%
Neuroscience 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,860
of 12,923,846 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anatomy
#854
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,728
of 296,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anatomy
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,923,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.